Squaring the Culture




"...and I will make justice the plumb line, and righteousness the level;
then hail will sweep away the refuge of lies,
and the waters will overflow the secret place."
Isaiah 28:17

06/08/2011 (12:28 pm)

Hypocrisy: a Checklist

Hi, all. I’m not blogging much these days, but I came across this pithy listing of some of the more hypocritical positions taken by Democrats, and thought it was worth preserving. All of us who think about issues from the conservative side notice these instances of sheer, indefensible hypocrisy from the left — it’s practically the hallmark of their movement — but have become so used to them, because there are so many and they come so regularly, that we tend to forget. Consequently, it’s useful to list them from time to time, to remember who it is that we’re dealing with.

The list came as a comment by a reader who calls himself Voltaire on National Review’s The Corner in response to an article about why Rep. Weiner’s unseemly Twitter behavior matters. Simply put, Weiner is the face of the new Democratic party: smug, aggressive, petulant, bullying, making the surface appearance of moral rectitude and intellectual precision. Underneath, he is a sewer, and unable even to control his own life. This is the evil we confront in the United States: fools who genuinely believe they should control our lives, but can’t even control their own.

Take it away, Voltaire:

OK, let’s deal with the idiotic “…but you hypocrites on the right.”

You want hypocrisy? Fine, try this for size:

1 – Five years ago: Guantanamo was the biggest stain in our national conscience, and had to be closed. Now: Guantanamo? What Guantanamo?

2 – Five years ago: The Patriot Act was the worst usurpation of power by an out-of-control administration, and the frightening ushering of an Orwellian society. Now: Hey, pass me that cool remote pen so I can sign an extension of the Patriot Act from overseas.

3 – Five years ago: 5% unemployment and $2 a gallon gasoline were the proof that the incompetent Bush administration had gotten us in “the worst recession after the great depression.” Now: 9.1% unemployment and $4 a gallon gasoline… trust us, we know what we are doing.

4 – Five years ago: Cindy Sheehan was paraded on every major news show as the conscience of an America that had been dragged into imperialistic conflicts by a war criminal masquerading as a President. Now: Cindy who?

5 – Five years ago: The Iraq war was the worst power grab by a President who bypassed congress to invade a foreign nation so he could line the pockets of Halliburton. Now: Lybia… we went into it because… we didn’t ask congress because… we are backing one side of a civil war because… Hey, who needs reasons when it’s the cool, liberal guy who does all this?

6 – Five years ago: Targeted drone assassinations were the proof we needed that we had a mindless cowboy in the White House, who shot first and asked questions later. Now: Hey, let’s have more!

7 – Five years ago: Partisanship was declared to be the worst form of needless bickering, and we were promised a new age of adult debate and civil discourse. Now: “Punish your enemy”–”Moats and alligators”–”Push grandma off a cliff”–”Let Down syndrome babies scavenge off the streets…”

8 – Rep. Giffords is shot by a mentally-incompetent lunatic: Sarah Palin and her over-the-top rhetoric pushed him to it, and we have to hear about that for weeks. Dec. 12, 2008: Sarah Palin’s church is doused in gasoline and set aflame–with women and children inside. Shhhh… don’t tell anyone…

I could go on and add another 20 points to the list, just off the top of my head. Feminists and Liberal philanderers. Black “civil rights leaders” (I love the expression) and their attempt to destroy anyone who wonders off the Democratic plantation.

Look: you want your guys to win at all costs? Fine. You like gutter-level snipers, smear merchants and attack dogs, as long as they get you the result you want? Fine. But at least, spare us the hypocrisy of the hypocrisy charge.

Remember: if a leftist makes any argument based on morality, principle, law, or justice, they don’t really believe that principle, moral, etc.; they’re just using it for the moment, and will violate it without a thought when it gets in their way. To the left, morals and principles are like beer bottles in a bar-room brawl; when it’s useful, hit someone with it, but then discard it because it’s not really good for anything else. They believe in power to themselves, and in nothing else, because they hold the delusion that they are Right™ and therefore above common morality.

« « What Happens When Flow Chart Geeks Have Too Much Time On Their Hands | Main | Righteous Indignation » »

4 Comments »

June 10, 2011 @ 8:37 am #

Glad you’re still alive, Phil. And glad you’re still kicking, too. Helpful reminder.

June 11, 2011 @ 11:21 am #

Ditto Dullhammer’s comment.

I’ve had a few shocks over the last 10 years or so – first, the concept that a religion (islam) could not only condone lying, but consider it a moral act if it furthered the religion, and second, the realization that Democrats employ the same approach to truth and ethics. Meaning they don’t have any.

The party has been taken over by Marxists – although most don’t know enough history to recognize it – and they have absorbed the lessons of Alinsky – even if they’ve never heard of him.

We are at war with the communists once again, but they are within the walls. We are not prepared for the hand to hand combat that must ensue if we are unable to rally the troops to do what must be done to oust them from their seats of power. Politics is only going to take us so far.

Kind of like the white hat sheriff who has to deal with the black hats…usually something completely unforeseen comes along and saves the white hat sheriff from doing some dastardly deed that is wrong by his precepts, but is the only way the black hats are going to be defeated.

If we have to do what we would consider morally wrong in order to save the nation, are we ultimately justified? Is it better to be righteous and enslaved than commit a wrong and be free? Is the slave justified in killing the slave master in order to achieve freedom?

June 18, 2011 @ 9:42 am #

Phil, you’ve been missed.

Hope you’re saving yourself for the 2012 campaign.

September 12, 2011 @ 11:50 am #

Hi Phil,

This caught my eye. Haven’t visited for quite a while, since it seemed like you went in shutdown mode in February.

I’ve missed the blog. There are others out there, but it’s tough to find one where you can discuss things at length, where threads don’t neccessarily die in hours, and which are at least civil, if edgy.

Hope you’re enjoying life and wishing you the best. If you’re too busy to blog, very understandable. It is surely nice to make a living, too. But you would certainly be welcomed back.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>